Search Constraints
« Previous |
1 - 50 of 101
|
Next »
Search Results
Select an image to start the slideshow
Acoustic Emission Monitoring for Assessment of Steel Bridge Details
1 of 50
White Paper: Tiltmeter-Based Bridge Scour Monitoring
2 of 50
Noise Localization via Acoustic Emission Monitoring on a Rolling Leaf Bascule Bridge
3 of 50
A new approach to acoustic emission testing of difficult-to-reach steel bridge details
4 of 50
Localization of Noise Sources in Large Structures Using AE
5 of 50
Acoustic Emission Tests Fremont Bridge Portland, Oregon
6 of 50
Acoustic emission and strain gage monitoring of prototype retrofit for Caltrans Structure B-22-26 R/L, I-80 Sacramento River (Bryte Bend), Sacramento, California.
7 of 50
Remote Global Monitoring of the Michigan Street Bridge, Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin
8 of 50
Acoustic Emission Monitoring of North East Trunnion Shaft on Oregon DOT Bridge 1377A: I-5 over the Columbia River, Portland, Oregon
9 of 50
Application of Acoustic, Strain, and Optical Sensors to NDE of Steel Highway Bridges
10 of 50
Problems Associated with Nondestructive Evaluation of Bridges
11 of 50
Acoustic Emission Monitoring of the Trunnion Shafts on the Oregon DOT Bridge 1377A: I-5 (interstate) Columbia River Bridge East Lift Span, Portland, Oregon. Technical Report# 6
12 of 50
Project No. B371, Acoustic Emission and Strain Gage Monitoring of WIDOT Structure B-5-158, Tower Drive Tied Arch - Green Bay, Wisconsin. Technical Report #1
13 of 50
Structural integrity assessment on pin and hanger connection of aging highway bridges using finite element analysis
14 of 50
Stray Current Corrosion in Electrified Rail Systems
15 of 50
Creep Database v1.1
16 of 50
Database of Slender Beam with Stirrups
17 of 50
Relaxation Database v1.1
18 of 50
"Comprehensive Database on Concrete Creep and Shrinkage". Structural Engineering Report No. 08-3/A210c.
19 of 50
Field Qualification of Inexpensive Wireless System to Monitor Micro-Meter Crack Response for Structural Health Monitoring
20 of 50
Comparative Field Qualification of ACM and ACSM Systems at Sycamore, IL
21 of 50
Kelunji EchoPro Crack and Structural Monitoring System: User Manual for Installation, Data Collection, and Data Analysis
22 of 50
Wireless Sensor Networks for Monitoring Cracks in Structures
23 of 50
Wireless Sensor Networks for Monitoring Cracks in Structures: Source Code and Configuration Files
24 of 50
Response of Concrete Block Structure to Quarry Induced Ground Motion and Weather
25 of 50
2008-2009 Report: Test House in Franklin, WI
26 of 50
Autonomous Crack Displacement Monitoring of a Residence Near a Quarry
27 of 50
Crack Response to Blast Vibrations and Moisture Induced Volumetric Changes in Foundation Soils
28 of 50
Autonomous Remote Crack Displacement Monitoring of a Residence Near a Limestone Quarry, Naples, Florida
29 of 50
Micro-meter Crack Response to Rock Blast Vibrations, Wind Gusts & Weather Effects
30 of 50
Ground Motions from and House Response to Underground Aggregate Mining
31 of 50
Qualification of Autonomous Crack Monitoring Systems
32 of 50
Residential Crack Response to Vibrations from Underground Mining
33 of 50
Structure Response to Trench and Road Blasting", Proceedings of the 3rd World Conference on Explosives and Blasting, European Federation of Explosives Engineers, Brighton, England
34 of 50
Wireless Sensor Networks for Crack Displacement Measurement
35 of 50
Florida SR-66 Sinkhole Monitoring
36 of 50
Crack Response of a Historic Structure to Weather Effects and Construction Vibrations
37 of 50
Standardization of Automated Crack Monitoring Apparatus for Long-Term Commercial Applications
38 of 50
Crack Response to Weather Effects, Blasting, and Construction Vibrations
39 of 50
Addendum I: Direct Measurement of Crack Response of Four OSM Study Structures
40 of 50
Comparison of Measured Crack Response in Diverse Structures to Dynamic Events and Weather Phenomena
41 of 50
Measure the Crack Instead of Construction Vibration
42 of 50
Autonomous Crack Comparometer Phase II
43 of 50
Autonomous Crack Comparometer
44 of 50
Comparison of Environmental and Blast Response in Blanford, Indiana
45 of 50
Potentiometers for Measuring Micro-inch Crack Displacements with Wireless Systems
46 of 50
Wireless data acquisition system. Smart Dust Challenge. Crossbow, Inc., San Jose, California.
47 of 50
Crossbow Technology, Inc. 2005 Smart Dust Challenge Poster
48 of 50
Wireless Data Acquisition System
49 of 50
TDR Monitoring of Soil Deformation: Case Histories and Field Techniques
50 of 50